My New Years Resolution: Fight for Freedom

I’m not one to make New Year’s resolutions. Why should an arbitrary date determine when I get my life in order?  If you require the start of a new year to lose weight, for instance, then you will probably fail because you lack the will to succeed.  If you had that will, you would have already lost the weight.

But for 2011, I am making a simple resolution. At every chance I get, I will fight for freedom. This isn’t some gimmicky attempt at boosting page views for my blog or trying to act tough. But when men and women are fighting and dying oversees to defend our freedom, we at home have a responsibility to fight as well. Not against the Taliban, but against the ever-faster creeping tide of authoritarianism.

We are no longer a country that values freedom above all else.  When something goes wrong, rather than pulling ourselves up by the bootstraps, we look for someone to sue, someone to blame, and a government program to rely on. Like parasites, we have become dependent on government. But just like a parasite will eventually kill the host, we are killing our freedom.

When the founding fathers fought against tyranny, they did not envision an entitlement culture like we have today. We are increasingly becoming a peasant society.  Historian Victor Hanson, writing in a recent editorial, said it best:

Traditional peasant societies believe in only a limited good. The more your neighbor earns, the less someone else gets. Profits are seen as a sort of theft. They must be either hidden or redistributed. Envy rather than admiration of success reigns.

In contrast, Western civilization began with a very different ancient Greek idea of an autonomous citizen, not an indentured serf or subsistence peasant. The small, independent landowner — if left to his own talents and if his success was protected by, and from, government — would create new sources of wealth for everyone. The resulting greater bounty for the poor soon trumped their old jealousy of the better off.

Citizens of ancient Greece and Italy soon proved more prosperous and free than either the tribal folk to the north and west, or the imperial subjects to the south and east. The success of later Western civilization in general, and America in particular, is testament to this legacy of the freedom of the individual in the widest political and economic sense.

We seem to be forgetting that lately — though Mao Zedong’s redistributive failures in China, or present-day bankrupt Greece, should warn us about what happens when government tries to enforce an equality of result rather than of opportunity.

Even after the failure of statism at the end of the Cold War, the disasters of socialism in Venezuela and Cuba, and the recent financial meltdowns in the European Union, for some reason America is returning to a peasant mentality of a limited good that redistributes wealth rather than creates it. Candidate Obama’s “spread the wealth” slip to Joe the Plumber simply was upgraded to President Obama’s “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”

The more his administration castigates insurers, businesses and doctors; raises taxes on the upper income brackets; and creates more regulations, the more those who create wealth are sitting out, neither hiring nor lending. The result is that traditional self-interested profit-makers are locking up trillions of dollars in unspent cash rather than using it to take risks and either lose money due to new red tape or see much of their profit largely confiscated through higher taxes.

No wonder that in such a climate of fear and suspicion, unemployment remains near 10 percent. Deficits chronically exceed $1 trillion per annum. And now the poverty rate has hit a historic high. We are all getting poorer in hopes that a few don’t get richer.

The public is seldom told that 1 percent of taxpayers already pay 40 percent of the income taxes collected, while 40 percent of income earners are exempt from federal income tax — or that present entitlements like Medicare and Social Security are financially unsustainable. Instead, they hear more often that those who managed to scheme to make above $250,000 per year have obligations to the rest of us to give back about 60 percent of what they earn in higher health care and income taxes — together with payroll and rising state income taxes, and along with increased capital gains and inheritance taxes.

That limited-good mind-set expects that businesses will agree that they now make enough money and so have no need to pursue any more profits at the expense of others. Therefore, they will gladly still hire the unemployed and buy new equipment — as they pay higher health care or income taxes to a government that knows far better how to redistribute their income to the more needy or deserving.

This peasant approach to commerce also assumes that businesses either cannot understand administration signals or can do nothing about them. So who cares that in the Chrysler bankruptcy settlement, quite arbitrarily the government put the unions in front of the legally entitled lenders?

Health insurers should not mind that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius just warned them to keep their profits down and their mouths shut — or face exclusion from health care markets.

I suppose that no corporation should worry that the government arbitrarily announced — without benefit a law or court ruling — that it wanted BP to put up $20 billion in cleanup costs for the Gulf spill.

What optimistic Americans used to call a rising tide that lifts all boats is now once again derided as trickle-down economics. In other words, a newly peasant-minded America is willing to become collectively poorer so that some will not become wealthier.

The present economy suggests that it is surely getting its wish.

Why has this happened? Why do we expect a “benevolent” government to give us “free” health care? Why do we expect the government to care for us, like a King for his subjects? But instead of one King, we have millions of nameless bureaucrats, paper-pushers, who decide what’s right and what’s wrong.

Bureaucrats from the IRS decide if you are following their complicated and moronic rules. They want to make government theft of property (aka taxes) as painful as possible.

Bureaucrats from the EPA have decided to label a gas we all inhale and exhale as part of living, Carbon Dioxide, as a pollutant. Therefore, these over-payed cancerous thugs get to regulate nearly every economic activity, since CO2 is a product of our most popular forms of energy production.

Bureaucrats from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) now have more control of health care than ever before.  Secretary Sebelius and her minions can blackmail insurance companies, cripple Doctors financially, and enforce “fairness,” all because of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” otherwise known as ObamaCare.  What sickens me most is that most legislators didn’t even know what was in the bill they voted for, since, as world-class moron Nancy Pelosi (formerly Madame Speaker) said:

This isn’t some silly rant about a pointless subject. Although most people in this country don’t give a damn, I will stand up and fight against the corrupt regime in Washington.  Go ahead, American morons, go back to your Jersey Shore.  Keep watching Maury to find out whether some white trash numbskull is the father of his girlfriend’s baby.  Stand in awe as Judge Judy decides some frivolous case between two bickering dimwits.  Jump for joy as your favorite team scores that winning goal, but never mind that our country is vanishing right before our eyes.  Keep pretending like everything is alright, even though we are far down the path to destruction.

It’s okay. I’ll carry the burden. I’ll take the mindless insults from mentally immature “progressives”.  I’ll watch in horror as my generation continues to believe the bullshit they read in mainstream media, as they sip their frappuccinos and wear their “Yes We Can” Obama t-shirts.

This year, I resolve to right for freedom.

 

Traditional peasant societies believe in only a limited good. The more your neighbor earns, the less someone else gets. Profits are seen as a sort of theft. They must be either hidden or redistributed. Envy rather than admiration of success reigns.

In contrast, Western civilization began with a very different ancient Greek idea of an autonomous citizen, not an indentured serf or subsistence peasant. The small, independent landowner — if left to his own talents and if his success was protected by, and from, government — would create new sources of wealth for everyone. The resulting greater bounty for the poor soon trumped their old jealousy of the better off.

Receive news alerts

Citizens of ancient Greece and Italy soon proved more prosperous and free than either the tribal folk to the north and west, or the imperial subjects to the south and east. The success of later Western civilization in general, and America in particular, is testament to this legacy of the freedom of the individual in the widest political and economic sense.

We seem to be forgetting that lately — though Mao Zedong’s redistributive failures in China, or present-day bankrupt Greece, should warn us about what happens when government tries to enforce an equality of result rather than of opportunity.

Even after the failure of statism at the end of the Cold War, the disasters of socialism in Venezuela and Cuba, and the recent financial meltdowns in the European Union, for some reason America is returning to a peasant mentality of a limited good that redistributes wealth rather than creates it. Candidate Obama’s “spread the wealth” slip to Joe the Plumber simply was upgraded to President Obama’s “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”

The more his administration castigates insurers, businesses and doctors; raises taxes on the upper income brackets; and creates more regulations, the more those who create wealth are sitting out, neither hiring nor lending. The result is that traditional self-interested profit-makers are locking up trillions of dollars in unspent cash rather than using it to take risks and either lose money due to new red tape or see much of their profit largely confiscated through higher taxes.

No wonder that in such a climate of fear and suspicion, unemployment remains near 10 percent. Deficits chronically exceed $1 trillion per annum. And now the poverty rate has hit a historic high. We are all getting poorer in hopes that a few don’t get richer.

The public is seldom told that 1 percent of taxpayers already pay 40 percent of the income taxes collected, while 40 percent of income earners are exempt from federal income tax — or that present entitlements like Medicare and Social Security are financially unsustainable. Instead, they hear more often that those who managed to scheme to make above $250,000 per year have obligations to the rest of us to give back about 60 percent of what they earn in higher health care and income taxes — together with payroll and rising state income taxes, and along with increased capital gains and inheritance taxes.

That limited-good mind-set expects that businesses will agree that they now make enough money and so have no need to pursue any more profits at the expense of others. Therefore, they will gladly still hire the unemployed and buy new equipment — as they pay higher health care or income taxes to a government that knows far better how to redistribute their income to the more needy or deserving.

This peasant approach to commerce also assumes that businesses either cannot understand administration signals or can do nothing about them. So who cares that in the Chrysler bankruptcy settlement, quite arbitrarily the government put the unions in front of the legally entitled lenders?

Health insurers should not mind that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius just warned them to keep their profits down and their mouths shut — or face exclusion from health care markets.

I suppose that no corporation should worry that the government arbitrarily announced — without benefit a law or court ruling — that it wanted BP to put up $20 billion in cleanup costs for the Gulf spill.

What optimistic Americans used to call a rising tide that lifts all boats is now once again derided as trickle-down economics. In other words, a newly peasant-minded America is willing to become collectively poorer so that some will not become wealthier.

The present economy suggests that it is surely getting its wish.

Advertisements

Comments Off on My New Years Resolution: Fight for Freedom

Filed under Politics, The Truth

Comments are closed.